In a very hotly contested matter, the Coastal court, in a 21-page opinion, ruled on cross motions for summary judgment that the surety wearing multiple hats – as a payment bond surety, performance bond surety satisfying outstanding payables that had not matured into payment bond claims, and backdoor financing surety – had priority over a completing obligee’s right of set-off. The opinion addresses various equitable subrogation principles and multiple claims and defenses asserted by the obligee, such as:
- competing interests between completing obligee versus payment bond surety;
- competing interests between completing obligee versus performance bond surety;
- competing interests between completing obligee versus financing surety;
- obligee’s right of set-off;
- distinguishing Munsey and limiting Fortune;
- lack of breach of performance bond;
- lack of breach of payment bond; and
- “relation back” and “no debt due” principles; and
- obligee as a judgment creditor.
We trust this decision may prove to be helpful in the future.